m houstonense atcc 49403t Search Results


94
ATCC fortuitum
Fortuitum, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Mycobacterium+houstonense+Schinsky+et+al/us07294489-280-97-98
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fortuitum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC m fortuitum unnamed third biovariant complex atcc 49403
M Fortuitum Unnamed Third Biovariant Complex Atcc 49403, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Mycobacterium+Houstonense/10__1128_slash_aac__40__4__874-33-8-14
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m fortuitum unnamed third biovariant complex atcc 49403 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
ATCC mycobacterium genomospecies 3
Mycobacterium Genomospecies 3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Trichomonas+stableri%3B+Strain%3A+CA015840/pm15388725-101-4-7
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mycobacterium genomospecies 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

w6705t  (ATCC)
90
ATCC w6705t
W6705t, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Agaricus+bisporus+(Lange)+Imbach%2C+teleomorph/pm15388725-260-11-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
w6705t - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
Addgene inc mscv ezh2 δset hygro
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> <t>(Y641-F)</t> and <t>EZH2–ΔSET</t> retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Mscv Ezh2 δset Hygro, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/MSCV-FlagmuEzh2deltaset-Hygro+(Plasmid+%2349403)/pmc09708848-433-3-23
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mscv ezh2 δset hygro - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC m neworleansense atcc 49404t
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> <t>(Y641-F)</t> and <t>EZH2–ΔSET</t> retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
M Neworleansense Atcc 49404t, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Mycobacterium%3B+neworleansense/10__1128_slash_genomea__01314___15-23-4-6
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m neworleansense atcc 49404t - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATCC porphyromonas salivosa atcc 49407t
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> <t>(Y641-F)</t> and <t>EZH2–ΔSET</t> retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Porphyromonas Salivosa Atcc 49407t, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Porphyromonas+salivosa+(Love+et+al%2E)+Love+et+al/pm15774632-31-143-145
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
porphyromonas salivosa atcc 49407t - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

w5198t  (ATCC)
90
ATCC w5198t
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> <t>(Y641-F)</t> and <t>EZH2–ΔSET</t> retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
W5198t, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Phytophthora+cinnamomi+Rands/pm15388725-242-11-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
w5198t - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC m fortuitum
Strains and sequences used for analysis of 16S-23S spacer sequences
M Fortuitum, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/16S/pmc00153362-65-36-39
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m fortuitum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATCC b b b m houstonense
Results of FL-HPLC with two strains of M. porcinum and three reference strains. The patterns of the last four isolates (B to D) are considered indistinguishable. (A) M. intracellulare ATCC 13950T; (B) M. porcinum ATCC 33776T; (C) M. porcinum ATCC 49939; (D) M. peregrinum type I ATCC 14467T; (E) M. fortuitum ATCC 6841T.
B B B M Houstonense, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m+houstonense+atcc+49403t/Mycobacterium+boenickei+Schinsky+et+al/pmc00535230-351-193-200
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b b b m houstonense - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A Schematic representation of EZH2 (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Schematic representation of EZH2 (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Retroviral, Over Expression, Construct, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, In Vivo, Wound Healing Assay, Migration, Boyden Chamber Assay

A Schematic representation for generation of control Td-Tomato + and H3K27me3 High (Y641-F) GFP + 4T-1 cells by retroviral transduction (upper panel). The schematic delineation of different strategies used in the in vivo studies (lower panel). B , C Live fluorescence imaging of primary tumors and distant metastatic sites were shown under different strategies (described in Methods, Animal studies section). The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato- 570-620 nm and GFP-465-520 nm. D The fluorescence imaging of harvested control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) primary tumors at a specific wavelength (upper panel). The metastatic potential of control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells was analyzed by fluorescence imaging in the harvested organs at a specific wavelength (lower panel). E The fluorescence images of single-cell harvested from both tumors control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) and harvested organs ( n = 3). Scale bar 50 μm. F Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in primary tumors and metastatic organs harvested from mice ( n = 3). G The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in harvested primary tumors and metastatic organs ( n = 3), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0120 and # P = 0.00484, respectively, compared to Td-Tomato group, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. H Photomicrographs of H&E staining in the lung, liver, and spleen of control and Y641-F tumor-bearing mice. Scale bar 50 μm. I Photomicrographs of metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice under bright field (extreme left) and GFP fluorescence (middle left) panels, respectively. Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: GFP-465-520 nm. Colony formation assay was carried out in metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice, stained with crystal violet, and photo-micrographic images were taken under bright field (middle right) and inset (extreme right) panels. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Schematic representation for generation of control Td-Tomato + and H3K27me3 High (Y641-F) GFP + 4T-1 cells by retroviral transduction (upper panel). The schematic delineation of different strategies used in the in vivo studies (lower panel). B , C Live fluorescence imaging of primary tumors and distant metastatic sites were shown under different strategies (described in Methods, Animal studies section). The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato- 570-620 nm and GFP-465-520 nm. D The fluorescence imaging of harvested control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) primary tumors at a specific wavelength (upper panel). The metastatic potential of control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells was analyzed by fluorescence imaging in the harvested organs at a specific wavelength (lower panel). E The fluorescence images of single-cell harvested from both tumors control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) and harvested organs ( n = 3). Scale bar 50 μm. F Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in primary tumors and metastatic organs harvested from mice ( n = 3). G The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in harvested primary tumors and metastatic organs ( n = 3), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0120 and # P = 0.00484, respectively, compared to Td-Tomato group, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. H Photomicrographs of H&E staining in the lung, liver, and spleen of control and Y641-F tumor-bearing mice. Scale bar 50 μm. I Photomicrographs of metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice under bright field (extreme left) and GFP fluorescence (middle left) panels, respectively. Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: GFP-465-520 nm. Colony formation assay was carried out in metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice, stained with crystal violet, and photo-micrographic images were taken under bright field (middle right) and inset (extreme right) panels. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Control, Retroviral, Transduction, In Vivo, Fluorescence, Imaging, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay, Staining, Isolation, Colony Assay

A The schematic representation of experimental planning. B The immunoblot analysis of EZH2, H3K27me3 expression in 4T-1 cells harvested from the primary tumor and metastatic organs; GAPDH was used as a loading control. C The in vivo imaging of mice having a primary tumor and splenic metastatic cell inoculation ( n = 5). The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. C Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0038, compared to the primary tumor, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. D The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mammary tumor onset in the nude mice with inoculation of the primary tumor and spleen metastatic cells (n = 6). * P = 0.0150, compared to the primary tumor, log-rank test. E Volcano plot represents the significant differential expression of genes between control and Y641-F cells. Red and blue dots represent the upregulated and downregulated genes with (Log 2 FC +1, −1, and p < 0.05), respectively. F Heat map of top 100 ranked genes differentially expressed between control and Y641-F phenotype. Expression values are represented as colors, where the range of colors (red, pink, light blue, dark blue) shows the range of expression values (high, moderate, low, lowest), respectively. G Heat map shows differential expression of cell migration and metastasis-related genes between control and Y641-F. H RNA was isolated from control and EZH2 Y641-F 4T-1 cells and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, *,# P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0134, $ P = 0.001, %,+,&,^ P = 0.0001, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. I RNA was isolated from 4T-1 cells isolated from the primary tumor, metastatic lung, liver, and spleen and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, left panel, * P = 0.0162, # P = 0.0101, X P = 0.0031, @ P = 0.0002, $ P = 0.0065, % P = 0.0039, + P = 0.0001, & P = 0.001, ^ P = 0.0001, right panel, * P = 0.0001, # P = 0.0009, @ P = 0.0001, $ P = 0.0088, % P = 0.0009 and + P = 0.0493, compared to isolated cells from primary tumors, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A The schematic representation of experimental planning. B The immunoblot analysis of EZH2, H3K27me3 expression in 4T-1 cells harvested from the primary tumor and metastatic organs; GAPDH was used as a loading control. C The in vivo imaging of mice having a primary tumor and splenic metastatic cell inoculation ( n = 5). The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. C Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0038, compared to the primary tumor, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. D The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mammary tumor onset in the nude mice with inoculation of the primary tumor and spleen metastatic cells (n = 6). * P = 0.0150, compared to the primary tumor, log-rank test. E Volcano plot represents the significant differential expression of genes between control and Y641-F cells. Red and blue dots represent the upregulated and downregulated genes with (Log 2 FC +1, −1, and p < 0.05), respectively. F Heat map of top 100 ranked genes differentially expressed between control and Y641-F phenotype. Expression values are represented as colors, where the range of colors (red, pink, light blue, dark blue) shows the range of expression values (high, moderate, low, lowest), respectively. G Heat map shows differential expression of cell migration and metastasis-related genes between control and Y641-F. H RNA was isolated from control and EZH2 Y641-F 4T-1 cells and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, *,# P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0134, $ P = 0.001, %,+,&,^ P = 0.0001, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. I RNA was isolated from 4T-1 cells isolated from the primary tumor, metastatic lung, liver, and spleen and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, left panel, * P = 0.0162, # P = 0.0101, X P = 0.0031, @ P = 0.0002, $ P = 0.0065, % P = 0.0039, + P = 0.0001, & P = 0.001, ^ P = 0.0001, right panel, * P = 0.0001, # P = 0.0009, @ P = 0.0001, $ P = 0.0088, % P = 0.0009 and + P = 0.0493, compared to isolated cells from primary tumors, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, In Vivo Imaging, Quantitative Proteomics, Migration, Isolation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression

A Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 OE HCC1806 cells. B Control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by Immunoblot. C Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 EZH1SET HCC1806 cells. D The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and performed qPCR analysis for KRT14 expression. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, compared to control * P = 0.0001 and Y641-F # P = 0.0001, respectively, one-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. E The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. F The vehicle control and Tet-ON EZH2-YFP OE HCC1806 cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2 WT, EZH2-YFP, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. G The HCC1806 cells were treated either for vehicle control or 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 for the analysis of the expression of KRT14 by RT-qPCR. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, * P = 0.0001 compared to control cells, student’s t -test (two-sided). H The HCC1806 and MDAMB468 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to check the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. I HCC-1806 cells were treated with either vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 treatments for 24 h, co-stained with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) antibodies, and analyzed under a confocal microscope. Scale bar, 50 μm. J , K 4T-1 cells were isolated from primary tumors and metastatic spleen and subjected to confocal analysis after having either co-staining ( J ) with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) or single ( K ) staining with Ki-67 (red) antibodies. In both cases, DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Scale bar 20 and 5 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 OE HCC1806 cells. B Control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by Immunoblot. C Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 EZH1SET HCC1806 cells. D The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and performed qPCR analysis for KRT14 expression. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, compared to control * P = 0.0001 and Y641-F # P = 0.0001, respectively, one-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. E The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. F The vehicle control and Tet-ON EZH2-YFP OE HCC1806 cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2 WT, EZH2-YFP, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. G The HCC1806 cells were treated either for vehicle control or 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 for the analysis of the expression of KRT14 by RT-qPCR. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, * P = 0.0001 compared to control cells, student’s t -test (two-sided). H The HCC1806 and MDAMB468 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to check the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. I HCC-1806 cells were treated with either vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 treatments for 24 h, co-stained with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) antibodies, and analyzed under a confocal microscope. Scale bar, 50 μm. J , K 4T-1 cells were isolated from primary tumors and metastatic spleen and subjected to confocal analysis after having either co-staining ( J ) with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) or single ( K ) staining with Ki-67 (red) antibodies. In both cases, DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Scale bar 20 and 5 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Staining, Microscopy, Isolation

A Diagrammatic scheme showing the genomic location of the KRT14 gene for both mice and humans. B ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K27me3, p-Pol-II-S5, and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.5 to −0.2 kb of the KRT14 gene. C Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( B ). D , E The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were observed in −0.2 and −0.5 kb regions from TSS in control and EZH2-Y641-F cells by ChIP qPCR. F The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were analyzed in the −0.2 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. G ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K4me3 and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.1 to +2.4 kb of the KRT14 gene. H Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( G ). I The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 + 2.4 kb region from TSS in control and EZH2- Y641-F 4T-1 cells by ChIP qPCR. J The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 was analyzed in +2.4 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. B – F Columns, are the mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, B , C compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0158, # P = 0.0001, % P = 0.0003, $ P = 0.0001, & P = 0.0001 and @ P = 0.0004, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. D – F compared to control, left to right, * P = 0.0029, # P = 0.0025, $ P = 0.0022, & P = 0.0024, % P = 0.0036 and + P = 0.0134, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. G – I columns, a mean of duplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, G , H compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0023 and # P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparison test. I compared to VC, * P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. J Columns, a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, compared to VC, # P = 0.0082, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Diagrammatic scheme showing the genomic location of the KRT14 gene for both mice and humans. B ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K27me3, p-Pol-II-S5, and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.5 to −0.2 kb of the KRT14 gene. C Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( B ). D , E The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were observed in −0.2 and −0.5 kb regions from TSS in control and EZH2-Y641-F cells by ChIP qPCR. F The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were analyzed in the −0.2 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. G ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K4me3 and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.1 to +2.4 kb of the KRT14 gene. H Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( G ). I The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 + 2.4 kb region from TSS in control and EZH2- Y641-F 4T-1 cells by ChIP qPCR. J The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 was analyzed in +2.4 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. B – F Columns, are the mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, B , C compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0158, # P = 0.0001, % P = 0.0003, $ P = 0.0001, & P = 0.0001 and @ P = 0.0004, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. D – F compared to control, left to right, * P = 0.0029, # P = 0.0025, $ P = 0.0022, & P = 0.0024, % P = 0.0036 and + P = 0.0134, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. G – I columns, a mean of duplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, G , H compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0023 and # P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparison test. I compared to VC, * P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. J Columns, a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, compared to VC, # P = 0.0082, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Control, ChIP-qPCR, Comparison

A , B The KRT14 knockdown was confirmed through immunoblot by using two different shRNA in 4T-1 and HCC1806 cells. The β-actin is used as a loading control. C – F Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and KRT14 KD in 4T-1 ( C ) and HCC1806 ( E ), magnification 10 ×. D , F The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay. Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bar, ±SD, * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. G – J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( G ) and HCC1806 ( I ) cells at 24 h. The quantitative bar graphs of the trans-well chamber migration assay of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( H ) and HCC1806 ( J ) cells are shown. Columns represent a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D. compared to control, $ P = 0.0002, % P = 0.0058, Student’s t -test (two-sided). K Fluorescence imaging of metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). The Td-Tomato fluorescence is for control cells, and GFP fluorescence is for KRT14 KD (left panel). Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato-570–620 nm and GFP-465–520 nm. L The quantitative analysis for the metastatic control (Td-Tomato +) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) cells harvested from the spleen ( n = 5, three different fields from each spleen), Columns, a mean of fifteen readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, & P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). M Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). N The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5) Columns, a mean of five readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, @ P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , B The KRT14 knockdown was confirmed through immunoblot by using two different shRNA in 4T-1 and HCC1806 cells. The β-actin is used as a loading control. C – F Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and KRT14 KD in 4T-1 ( C ) and HCC1806 ( E ), magnification 10 ×. D , F The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay. Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bar, ±SD, * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. G – J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( G ) and HCC1806 ( I ) cells at 24 h. The quantitative bar graphs of the trans-well chamber migration assay of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( H ) and HCC1806 ( J ) cells are shown. Columns represent a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D. compared to control, $ P = 0.0002, % P = 0.0058, Student’s t -test (two-sided). K Fluorescence imaging of metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). The Td-Tomato fluorescence is for control cells, and GFP fluorescence is for KRT14 KD (left panel). Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato-570–620 nm and GFP-465–520 nm. L The quantitative analysis for the metastatic control (Td-Tomato +) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) cells harvested from the spleen ( n = 5, three different fields from each spleen), Columns, a mean of fifteen readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, & P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). M Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). N The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5) Columns, a mean of five readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, @ P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Knockdown, Western Blot, shRNA, Control, Wound Healing Assay, Migration, Fluorescence, Imaging, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay

A Analysis of EZH2 and KRT14 transcript levels on the basis of ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 expression in different PAM50 subtypes represented in a heat map. Data are retrieved from the Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) data set, publicly accessible via XENA USSC Cancer Genome Browser. B Representative of heat map in the form of box and Whiskers plot for Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) PAM50 subtypes, Normal (Brown) n = 66, ESRI s.d. = 1.01, mean = −0.26, PGR s.d. = 2.35, mean = 0.474, ERBB2s.d. = 1.41, mean = −0.212, EZH2 s.d. = 0.80, mean = −0.505 and KRT14 s.d = 2.33, mean = 2.76. Luminal B (sky blue) n = 139, ESR1 s.d. = 0.39, mean = 0.071, PGR, s.d. = 2.44, mean = 0.155, ERBB2 s.d. = 1.36, mean = −0.420, EZH2 s.d. =1.20, mean=0.366, KRT14 s.d = 2.47, mean = −2.28.Luminal A n = 222, ESR1 s.d.=0.45, mean = −0.301, PGR s.d.= 2.27, mean=1.26, ERBB2 s.d.=1.43, mean = −0.195, EZH2 s.d. = 0.725, mean = −0647 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.80, mean = 0.752. HER+ n = 102, ESR1 s.d. = 1.70, mean = −1.842, PGR s.d. = 1.56, mean = −1.48, ERBB2, s.d. = 2.59, mean = 3.29, EZH2 s.d. = 0.78, mean = 0.303 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.79, mean = −1.906. Basal n = 170, ESR1 s.d. = 1.80, mean = −2.76, PGR s.d. = 0.791, mean = −1.54, ERBB2 s.d. = 2.50, mean = −1.18, EZH2 s.d. = 0.98, mean = 1.97 and KRT14 s.d. = 3.42, mean = 1.45. Whiskers for the plot signify SD and the bar denotes the mean for each subtype, where the box extends from 25th to 75th percentile, and whiskers range from minimum and maximum value, with the center denoting the median value. C Correlation plot showing IHC co-expression of the EZH2 and KRT14 in breast cancer TNBC subtype. Pearson pairwise correlation coefficient on 897 TNBC samples shows a positive correlation ( r = 0.10) between EZH2 and KRT14 and is significantly associated with each other ( p = 0.0018). D Immunohistochemistry was carried out to detect EZH2, H3K27me3, and KRT14 in FFPE serial sections of matched human TNBC primary tumor and respective metastatic counterparts using anti-EZH2, anti-H3K27me3, and anti-KRT14 antibodies. Representative photomicrographs were shown at 10X and 40X magnifications (inset). Scale bar, 200 μm (10×) or 50 μm (40×). E – G Quantitative H-scores for TNBC primary tumors and metastatic counterparts ( n = 10) were calculated for EZH2 ( E ), H3K27me3 ( F ), and KRT14 ( G ) expression and represented as scatter plots; error bar, ±SD, left to right * P = 0.0047, # P = 0.046, compared to expression in respective primary tumors, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Analysis of EZH2 and KRT14 transcript levels on the basis of ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 expression in different PAM50 subtypes represented in a heat map. Data are retrieved from the Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) data set, publicly accessible via XENA USSC Cancer Genome Browser. B Representative of heat map in the form of box and Whiskers plot for Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) PAM50 subtypes, Normal (Brown) n = 66, ESRI s.d. = 1.01, mean = −0.26, PGR s.d. = 2.35, mean = 0.474, ERBB2s.d. = 1.41, mean = −0.212, EZH2 s.d. = 0.80, mean = −0.505 and KRT14 s.d = 2.33, mean = 2.76. Luminal B (sky blue) n = 139, ESR1 s.d. = 0.39, mean = 0.071, PGR, s.d. = 2.44, mean = 0.155, ERBB2 s.d. = 1.36, mean = −0.420, EZH2 s.d. =1.20, mean=0.366, KRT14 s.d = 2.47, mean = −2.28.Luminal A n = 222, ESR1 s.d.=0.45, mean = −0.301, PGR s.d.= 2.27, mean=1.26, ERBB2 s.d.=1.43, mean = −0.195, EZH2 s.d. = 0.725, mean = −0647 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.80, mean = 0.752. HER+ n = 102, ESR1 s.d. = 1.70, mean = −1.842, PGR s.d. = 1.56, mean = −1.48, ERBB2, s.d. = 2.59, mean = 3.29, EZH2 s.d. = 0.78, mean = 0.303 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.79, mean = −1.906. Basal n = 170, ESR1 s.d. = 1.80, mean = −2.76, PGR s.d. = 0.791, mean = −1.54, ERBB2 s.d. = 2.50, mean = −1.18, EZH2 s.d. = 0.98, mean = 1.97 and KRT14 s.d. = 3.42, mean = 1.45. Whiskers for the plot signify SD and the bar denotes the mean for each subtype, where the box extends from 25th to 75th percentile, and whiskers range from minimum and maximum value, with the center denoting the median value. C Correlation plot showing IHC co-expression of the EZH2 and KRT14 in breast cancer TNBC subtype. Pearson pairwise correlation coefficient on 897 TNBC samples shows a positive correlation ( r = 0.10) between EZH2 and KRT14 and is significantly associated with each other ( p = 0.0018). D Immunohistochemistry was carried out to detect EZH2, H3K27me3, and KRT14 in FFPE serial sections of matched human TNBC primary tumor and respective metastatic counterparts using anti-EZH2, anti-H3K27me3, and anti-KRT14 antibodies. Representative photomicrographs were shown at 10X and 40X magnifications (inset). Scale bar, 200 μm (10×) or 50 μm (40×). E – G Quantitative H-scores for TNBC primary tumors and metastatic counterparts ( n = 10) were calculated for EZH2 ( E ), H3K27me3 ( F ), and KRT14 ( G ) expression and represented as scatter plots; error bar, ±SD, left to right * P = 0.0047, # P = 0.046, compared to expression in respective primary tumors, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry

A Immunoblot for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in Control and EZH2 knockdown (KD) 4T-1 cells. B – E Representative images of the wound healing ( B ) and trans-well chamber migration ( D ) assays in control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( C ) and trans-well ( E ) assay; Columns, mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, * P = 0.0453, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test and # P = 0.0467 student’s t -test (two-sided). F Bioluminescence image of tumor-bearing control (top panel), EZH2 KD (bottom panel) mice. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI). Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, $ P = 0.0010 compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. H Bioluminescence images of liver and spleen harvested from control and EZH2 KD tumor-bearing mice. I The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice cells ( n = 10), % P = 0.0001, compared to control, log-rank test. J – M Representative images of the wound healing ( J ) and trans-well chamber migration ( L ) assays in 4T-1 EZH2Y641-F (control) and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( K ) and trans-well ( M ) assay; Columns, a mean of duplicate ( K ) and triplicate ( M ) readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, & P = 0.0158, ^ P = 0.0219, X P = 0.0011, Y P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. N Representative bioluminescence images of EZH2 (Y641-F) 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice, treated with either vehicle or EPZ6438 (250 mg/Kg). O Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI); columns, a mean reading of triplicate samples, error bar, ±SD, Z P = 0.0078, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. P The bioluminescence analysis of the metastatic signal in the organs harvested from control (Y641-F) and EPZ6438 treated mice. Q The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of nude mice, either treated with vehicle control ( n = 5) or EPZ6438 (250 mg/kg) ( n = 5). @ P = 0.0326, compared to vehicle control, log-rank test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Immunoblot for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in Control and EZH2 knockdown (KD) 4T-1 cells. B – E Representative images of the wound healing ( B ) and trans-well chamber migration ( D ) assays in control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( C ) and trans-well ( E ) assay; Columns, mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, * P = 0.0453, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test and # P = 0.0467 student’s t -test (two-sided). F Bioluminescence image of tumor-bearing control (top panel), EZH2 KD (bottom panel) mice. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI). Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, $ P = 0.0010 compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. H Bioluminescence images of liver and spleen harvested from control and EZH2 KD tumor-bearing mice. I The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice cells ( n = 10), % P = 0.0001, compared to control, log-rank test. J – M Representative images of the wound healing ( J ) and trans-well chamber migration ( L ) assays in 4T-1 EZH2Y641-F (control) and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( K ) and trans-well ( M ) assay; Columns, a mean of duplicate ( K ) and triplicate ( M ) readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, & P = 0.0158, ^ P = 0.0219, X P = 0.0011, Y P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. N Representative bioluminescence images of EZH2 (Y641-F) 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice, treated with either vehicle or EPZ6438 (250 mg/Kg). O Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI); columns, a mean reading of triplicate samples, error bar, ±SD, Z P = 0.0078, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. P The bioluminescence analysis of the metastatic signal in the organs harvested from control (Y641-F) and EPZ6438 treated mice. Q The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of nude mice, either treated with vehicle control ( n = 5) or EPZ6438 (250 mg/kg) ( n = 5). @ P = 0.0326, compared to vehicle control, log-rank test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Knockdown, Migration

Schematic representation of how catalytically hyperactive EZH2 (increased H3K27me3) can promote TNBC peritoneal metastasis and its therapeutic vulnerabilities against EZH2 inhibitor EPZ6438.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic representation of how catalytically hyperactive EZH2 (increased H3K27me3) can promote TNBC peritoneal metastasis and its therapeutic vulnerabilities against EZH2 inhibitor EPZ6438.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques:

Strains and sequences used for analysis of 16S-23S spacer sequences

Journal:

Article Title: Differentiation between Mycobacterium farcinogenes and Mycobacterium senegalense Strains Based on 16S-23S Ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences

doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.707-711.2002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Strains and sequences used for analysis of 16S-23S spacer sequences

Article Snippet: The results presented in Fig. show that M. farcinogenes and M. senegalense have identical partial 16S rDNA sequences that distinguish them from representatives of closely related taxa, with the exception of the sorbitol-positive third biovariant of M. fortuitum (strain ATCC 49403); this variant was not included in the present study (the 16S rDNA sequence is shown in reference 17 , and its ITS sequence, which differs from that of M. farcinogenes and M. senegalense, has been recently submitted to the RIDOM database [http://www.ridom.de]).

Techniques:

Results of FL-HPLC with two strains of M. porcinum and three reference strains. The patterns of the last four isolates (B to D) are considered indistinguishable. (A) M. intracellulare ATCC 13950T; (B) M. porcinum ATCC 33776T; (C) M. porcinum ATCC 49939; (D) M. peregrinum type I ATCC 14467T; (E) M. fortuitum ATCC 6841T.

Journal:

Article Title: Clinical and Laboratory Features of Mycobacterium porcinum †

doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5689-5697.2004

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of FL-HPLC with two strains of M. porcinum and three reference strains. The patterns of the last four isolates (B to D) are considered indistinguishable. (A) M. intracellulare ATCC 13950T; (B) M. porcinum ATCC 33776T; (C) M. porcinum ATCC 49939; (D) M. peregrinum type I ATCC 14467T; (E) M. fortuitum ATCC 6841T.

Article Snippet: This comment is qualified by the observation that only a single strain each of M. septicum , M. neworleansense , and M. concordense has been reported and characterized to date ( 16 , 17 ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 TABLE 4. caption a7 Species (strain) (reference) Antibiotic resistance Carbohydrate utilization Low catalase (<100 mm) Unique PRA hsp65 gene Unique 16S r-DNA Clari (MIC, >4 μg/ml) Fox (MIC, ≥128 μg/ml) d -man i- myo -inos d -sorb l -rham Hyper-variable A region First 500 bp (5′ end) Entire sequence M. fortuitum (ATCC 6841 T ) ( 4 ) Var − − − − − − + + + + M. neworleansense (ATCC 49404 T ) ( 16 , 27 ) − − + + − − − − − a − + M. mageritense (ATCC 700351 T ) ( 26 ) + − + + + + + + + + + M. porcinum (ATCC 33776 T , BAA-328, ATCC 49939) − − + + − − − + − a − + M. septicum (ATCC 700731 T ) ( 17 ) − − + + − − − + − a , b − b − b M. houstonense (ATCC 49403 T ) ( 4 , 16 , 27 ) + + + + + − + − − c − c − c M. boenickei (ATCC 49935 T ) ( 16 ) − − + + − − − + − a NK + M. peregrinum type I (ATCC 14467 T ) ( 4 ) − − + − − − − + − b − b − b M. senegalense (ATCC 35796 T ) − − + − − − − + − c − c + Open in a separate window a M. porcinum and other members of the M. fortuitum third biovariant sorbitol-negative group, other than M. septicum , have the same hypervariable A sequence. b M. septicum and M. peregrinum type I have the same sequence over the entire 1,400-bp 16S rRNA gene sequence. c M. senegalense, M. houstonense , and M. farcinogenes have the same sequence over the first 500 bp.

Techniques:

Useful tests for separating M. porcinum from other members of the M. fortuitum group d

Journal:

Article Title: Clinical and Laboratory Features of Mycobacterium porcinum †

doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5689-5697.2004

Figure Lengend Snippet: Useful tests for separating M. porcinum from other members of the M. fortuitum group d

Article Snippet: This comment is qualified by the observation that only a single strain each of M. septicum , M. neworleansense , and M. concordense has been reported and characterized to date ( 16 , 17 ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 TABLE 4. caption a7 Species (strain) (reference) Antibiotic resistance Carbohydrate utilization Low catalase (<100 mm) Unique PRA hsp65 gene Unique 16S r-DNA Clari (MIC, >4 μg/ml) Fox (MIC, ≥128 μg/ml) d -man i- myo -inos d -sorb l -rham Hyper-variable A region First 500 bp (5′ end) Entire sequence M. fortuitum (ATCC 6841 T ) ( 4 ) Var − − − − − − + + + + M. neworleansense (ATCC 49404 T ) ( 16 , 27 ) − − + + − − − − − a − + M. mageritense (ATCC 700351 T ) ( 26 ) + − + + + + + + + + + M. porcinum (ATCC 33776 T , BAA-328, ATCC 49939) − − + + − − − + − a − + M. septicum (ATCC 700731 T ) ( 17 ) − − + + − − − + − a , b − b − b M. houstonense (ATCC 49403 T ) ( 4 , 16 , 27 ) + + + + + − + − − c − c − c M. boenickei (ATCC 49935 T ) ( 16 ) − − + + − − − + − a NK + M. peregrinum type I (ATCC 14467 T ) ( 4 ) − − + − − − − + − b − b − b M. senegalense (ATCC 35796 T ) − − + − − − − + − c − c + Open in a separate window a M. porcinum and other members of the M. fortuitum third biovariant sorbitol-negative group, other than M. septicum , have the same hypervariable A sequence. b M. septicum and M. peregrinum type I have the same sequence over the entire 1,400-bp 16S rRNA gene sequence. c M. senegalense, M. houstonense , and M. farcinogenes have the same sequence over the first 500 bp.

Techniques: Sequencing